In a message dated 12/13/2001 12:36:44 PM Pacific Standard Time, RWills@AdvancedEnergy.com writes:

Don - The make-up of the final voting contingent for IEEE 929 was 7 inverter manufacturers, 7 government lab/consultants, and 8 from utilities. The utility involvement was very important to achieve credibility for the group. The utility engineers did add complexity, but nothing was included in 929 that did not have really solid technical justification.

I really don't think that there was an "overbearing utility perspective".

Hi Rob
Since you were there, I retract that comment. Gee that leaves only 999 more reasons to bang utilities.

I do concur will Bill B that this needs to be fixed and blaming is not going to be productive.

Best, Don

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches@topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/

List rules & etiquette: http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch@homepower.com

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: michael.welch@homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe@topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================