In a message dated 12/15/2001 9:43:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, solar@eagle-access.net writes:

. But to retroactively retract their approval from inverters
that were manufactured and sold under their stamp of approval, seems
completely dictatorial and out of sync with the basic rights that we are
supposedly guaranteed to have.

Does anyone know if UL has ever done this before? If so, what were the
results? Was UL held liable for any damages?

Drake these are good points, but they did what they did and we probably do not have the full "behind the scenes" story. Now we have to put the pieces back together and move on.

Don

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches@topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/

List rules & etiquette: http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch@homepower.com

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: michael.welch@homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe@topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================