[RE-wrenches] Fwd: Refractometer reading has me stumped
Steve Higgins
steve at surrette.com
Mon Dec 21 11:20:13 PST 2015
Hey Allen.
Right off the top you did well in changing the settings.
The Battery Capacity being set to 440 Ah instead of 800, didn’t help as the inverter/charge controller are shutting off based on current, the smaller setting confuses the SOC meter. This setting should be roughly 846Ah, since this bank is severely sulphated, it may be a good idea to disable “end amps” or set the capacity higher to help force the inverters/chargers to stay in absorb charge.
Another issue is the Absorption voltage. You did good by setting to 58.8, actually for rolls batteries this is what the baseline should be setup if using BTS’s. Hopefully all of you are using BTS’s, as even in temperate locations it’s important to have these installed.
It was good to have set the inverter absorb at 58.8, and with that array I would have used 59.0 to 59.4 on the charge controller to maximize how much power the array was delivering at any one time. This higher voltage on the array will allow the inverter to finish charging earlier and optimize the array for recharging.
What are your absorb timers set to? For now since the batteries are severely sulphated I would disable end amps or return amps…
If the Bank is Healthy your absorb timers should have been:
Inverter (Assuming Max 70amp because of Source charger)
5 hours and 10 mins.
So if they were healthy or new, the setting should be just over 5 hours…. Now I would run it for at least 6 hours as this will act as a soft EQ, rather than cooking the battery regular EQ cycles.
Charge Controller Absorb Timer Settings should have been 4 hours and 30 mins, but until those sg’s recover, I would run the absorb for 6 hours per day, again rather than cooking the batteries with multiple EQ cycles.
Another thing I would do is adjust the float voltage up, at least until you see the SG’s recover into the .260’s or 270’s. I might go even as high at 55.2 to 56 volts.
It’ll take some time to get these SG’s up… the good news is voltages were pretty good, but it was just the SG’s that were in the dumps. My best guess, with daily, or every other day absorb charges with the generator it’ll take 3-4 weeks to get into the 70-80% range… If they use only the PV array the bank may not fully recover until late summer 2016… doing this the customers will lose their overall capacity by probably 10-20%...
Steve Higgins
Technical Services Manager
P: +1.902.597.4020
M: +1.206.790.5840
F: +1.902.597.8447
Surrette Battery Company
Exclusive manufacturer of
[cid:rollsfe1024]<http://www.rollsbattery.com>
**We will be closed the 24th to the 29th of December and open 30th and 31st. Closed again on January 1st open on Monday the 4th.**
[cid:wreatha88254]
From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Allan Sindelar
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:16 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Fwd: Refractometer reading has me stumped
Wrenches,
For years I have carried and used a refractometer to accurately measure SG of FLA batteries. I currently have a decent one, a nearly new Bosch Robinair 75240 that has always performed as intended.
A couple of days ago I was hired by another local company to investigate and troubleshoot an off grid system that they had recently installed that was not keeping up with the customer's needs and had crashed. I'll give more details below, but the short question is that on a very cold day, I began measuring the SG of the batteries and got readings of between 1.00 and 1.10 on all of the cells I tested, with no obvious cause. I have never seen this and am stumped as to the cause. I tested SG on about six cells in various locations and got readings nearly identical, and all off the scale on the low side. Note that I used the supplied pipette to sample electrolyte well below the surface of the full cells, and they were lightly gassing at the time, so I don't think that this is simply highly stratified electrolyte.
The system: 12 x 327 Sunpower modules (3.9 kW) on fixed rack; Schneider XW6048 with Power Distribution Panel, XW600-80 charge controller, System Control Panel, unused AGS and Schneider's new Conext Battery Monitor. Batteries are two strings of 8 Surrette S550s, for about 32 kw-hours of C/20 storage to 80% DOD. The system has been in operation for only about 3 months. The installation quality is mediocre at best, was located in an unheated TuffShed and is powering a doublewide mobile home. The inverter, controller and SCP were connected by the Xanbus system, but the Conext battery monitor was not.
The backup generator was a very basic manual-start 6kW Briggs & Stratton that had not been able to charge through the inverter as the inverter hadn't been properly programmed and would overload it. The site is at about 8,000' elevation, so we estimated about 4kW maximum output at 240V AC.
I hadn't seen pictures or been given an accurate component list before arriving on site, so was not fully prepared for what I found. The day was sunny and especially cold - best guess a high in the mid-20s (F). After four hours on site my fingers were too stiff to write normally. The battery SOC monitor indicated 100%, and the SCP bar graph also estimated the batteries to be nearly full. Battery voltage under charge on each 6V battery ranged from a low of 7.38V to a high of 7.50V, with a charge rate low enough to suggest absorption. The batteries had not been equalized since new, but new was claimed to be three months ago, and this appeared accurate.
The system owners are new to off grid, and while living frugally, claimed that the system worked well during sunny periods but had crashed on about the second day of cloudy weather. They had been using the forced air furnace, and when I arrived had a heat lamp (not labeled as to watts, but I assume 250W 130V) inside the leaky battery box, shining on some of the batteries.
As an aside, the 600V Schneider controller has no built-in display/interface, so there was no easy way to determine the charge mode or anything else except through the System Control Panel. That seems pretty bogus to me. I had not seen one of these previously, nor had I seen Schneider's shunt-based SOC meter. When I have installed XWs and SW Conexts I have always used Midnite E-Panels, which have conventional 500A shunts, and TriMetrics to offer accurate SOC for the customer.
The system settings all appeared to be set to default, other than "flooded" for battery type. Here are the changes I made in the setup. A couple of things I noticed:
1) with a default LBCO of 40.0V, on at least two occasions the batteries had been completely drained, and had been recharged only by the (substantial) array; but as the array is in theory (3.9kW/58V = 65A in good sun, or a c/12 charge rate, this suggests that even empty batteries will be recharged to full in 2-3 days.
2) battery capacity was set at default of 440AH, when it was actually about 850AH,so the charge rate would have tapered prematurely.
3) The bulk voltage was the default for 'flooded' - I don't know the default, as it isn't given in the XW manual and I changed it to 'custom'. I assume about 58.4V.
Setting name Previous setting New setting
Inverter LBCO (V) 40.0 (!)45.2
LBCO delay (seconds) 10 600
HBCO (V) 70.0 64.4
Battery capacity (AH) 440 D 800
Max charge rate (%) 100 D 72
AC2 input Vmin (V) 80 105
AC input priority AC1 AC2
Charge control and inverter EQ (V) 64.0 D 62.2
CC and inverter bulk & absorption voltage (V) 57.6 D 58.8
CC and inverter float (V) 54.0 D 53.6
Given all of this, I can't explain the extremely low SG readings. I tested about six or eight of the 48 cells, and all showed the same range. I admit that I trust my refractometer, but given the other readings, could I actually have completely dead cells, only three months old, showing close to 60V with little current flowing in while I measured them? WTF is going on here?
Thank you, as always,
Allan
--
Allan Sindelar
allan at sindelarsolar.com<mailto:allan at sindelarsolar.com>
NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder (Retired), Positive Energy, Inc.
505 780-2738 cell
This email and its attachments have been scanned by mailWatch E-Mail Firewall for viruses, spam, and malicious content.
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the entity or person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential/privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20151221/bbce1357/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rollsfe1024
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11941 bytes
Desc: rollsfe1024
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20151221/bbce1357/attachment-0002.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: wreatha88254
Type: image/png
Size: 251306 bytes
Desc: wreatha88254
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20151221/bbce1357/attachment-0004.png>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list