[RE-wrenches] Fall Protection Equipment

Tump tump at swnl.net
Tue Jan 20 03:57:53 PST 2015


I would offer the Sala "Exofit" NEX style harness part # 1113040 we use this style with the front & spring loaded rear (stays easily accessible) d rings weight is ~4.2 Lbs. Light weight easily adjusted and I believe they now offer this style with out the shoulder pad protection.  We also use a retractable lanyard 9' and they have a 14' as well, along with their horizontal life line prt # 7600506.
Warner; the ladder folks will be out with some new safety gear soon too.
What I find disappointing is that the manufacture's rep offer little education on how to purchase but much less the correct way to install.
OSHA offers very little aside from suggestions. Writing test questions for NABCEP I try to include fall arresting questions & find it VERY difficult to have reference material available to all, required to back up my questions. Something as simple as where to connect your attachment points are "suggested" by the manufacture, & not often reviewed by the harness user, not by OSHA.
We require our installers to read the provided manu's instruction and sign it + we review  & check each tech prior to climbing. tump

On Jan 17, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Ray Walters wrote:

> Hi Glenn;
> 
> What's your opinion on Petzl's professional line of full body harnesses?  I noticed too that their cool strapped helmets are ANSI  approved.  I never thought regular strapless construction hard hats made sense on a roof either. (always falling off and causing a hazard to workers below.....)
> R.Ray Walters
> CTO, Solarray, Inc
> Nabcep Certified PV Installer, 
> Licensed Master Electrician
> Solar Design Engineer
> 303 505-8760
> On 1/17/2015 2:05 PM, Glenn Burt wrote:
>> Standard OSHA personal safety harnesses are designed to keep someone upright and without pressure on the diaphragm in the event of loss of consciousness.
>> Having done substantial rock and ice climbing with state of the art climbing gear, I can tell you that it is not designed for that at all.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Glenn Burt
>> Sent from my 'smart' phone so please excuse grammar and typos.
>> From: William Miller
>> Sent: ‎1/‎17/‎2015 14:20
>> To: RE-wrenches
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Fall Protection Equipment
>> 
>> Friends:
>> 
>> Industrial fall protection with rear attachment offers no functionality in keeping a worker in place on a steep steel roof. We install planks in these situations but would also like to be able to cinch up a line connected to the workers waist or chest in the front to provide extra stability. Rear attached harnesses do not provide that. 
>> 
>> William 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 17, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Ray Walters <ray at solarray.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I prefer climbing gear as its much lighter weight and doesn't drag you around.  I actually think in some cases that traditional fall protection gear can be more of a tripping hazard than the safety it provides.   However, I was previously under the impression that if OSHA (or in the islands: HIOSH) came around, we had to ditch the climbing gear and get into the 3 times as heavy regular harnesses.
>>> I just looked at the OSHA website though, and it doesn't seem to specify certification, just that the equipment meet the fall criteria as Dan mentioned.
>>> https://www.osha.gov/Region7/fallprotection/fall_protection_info.html
>>> This doesn't mention test procedures or certification of equipment.  Here's more from the actual OSHA 1926 book:
>>> 
>>> 1926.502(e)(3)
>>> Connectors shall be drop forged, pressed or formed steel, or made of equivalent materials.
>>> 1926.502(e)(4)
>>> Connectors shall have a corrosion-resistant finish, and all surfaces and edges shall be smooth to prevent damage to interfacing parts of this system.
>>> 1926.502(e)(5)
>>> Connecting assemblies shall have a minimum tensile strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN)
>>> 1926.502(e)(6)
>>> Dee-rings and snaphooks shall be proof-tested to a minimum tensile load of 3,600 pounds (16 kN) without cracking, breaking, or taking permanent deformation.
>>> 
>>> "Equivalent materials" ?  Seems that an aluminum caribiner that meets the other criteria would be equivalent.
>>> 
>>> Here, Petzl also makes a full line of worker safety equipment: http://www.petzl.com/en/Professional/Verticality?l=US#.VLqw4nuLXfc
>>> 
>>> This is really interesting, and I would like to have a more definitive answer from OSHA.  It would be great if we could use lighter weight climbing gear; just compare a caribiner to the heavy steel monsters you get at Grainger's.  As long as it is strong enough:
>>> Lighter weight = less fatigue= safer,  IMHO.  
>>> As with so many discussions on this list, it will ultimately depend on your local authorities.
>>> R.Ray Walters
>>> CTO, Solarray, Inc
>>> Nabcep Certified PV Installer, 
>>> Licensed Master Electrician
>>> Solar Design Engineer
>>> 303 505-8760
>>> On 1/16/2015 11:20 PM, Benn Kilburn wrote:
>>>> James,
>>>> This looks like a pretty nice lanyard w/ shock-absorber, rope-grab and rope. 
>>>> 
>>>> What type/style harness did he bring along?
>>>> 
>>>> Re: OSHA approved...great question. Prior to looking into it further I'd suspect it falls in a "grey area". 
>>>> 
>>>> Benn Kilburn
>>>> SkyFire Energy Inc. 
>>>> 780-906-7807
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:29 AM, James Rudolph <jamesrudolph99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Aloha my Wrench Brothers!
>>>>> We have a recent defector from a very large National Solar company here that
>> 
>> [The entire original message is not included.]
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Change listserver email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out or update participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

> Tump at swnl.net               www.SWNL.net
>                 Solarwinds Northernlights       
>        Serving Mid Coast Maine & Northern California
>                          207-832-7574   Cl. 610-517-8401                              
>                               Blair "TUMP" May
>                ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
>                       NABCEP    "Certified PV Installer" 
>    
>               ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
>                   Trace Xantrex "Certified" Dealer / Installer"
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20150120/8cb2340c/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list