[RE-wrenches] Racking System - Identification Help

Dave Click daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu
Thu Jun 26 10:12:27 PDT 2014


As an update- the system used at this install turned out to be a 
currently-available product called SolAttach:
http://www.solattach.com/


On 2014/6/3, 11:11, Dave Click wrote:
> Jason, thanks for the comment! I agree that systems could connect to 
> just sheathing and stay on the roof- I think Zilla has a product that 
> does this too. My concern about wind resistance stems from the fact 
> that there appeared to be an engineer's stamp on the Unirac calcs with 
> lag screws and then something completely different was installed in 
> the field. It's likely that this installer has used this same mounting 
> system in windier coastal areas so hopefully their fastener selection 
> had some informed analysis... I didn't see any, though.
>
> And to be clear, I'm not looking to overrule another PE if it is in 
> fact an engineered system and it's just that the wrong set of plans 
> got submitted to the building department.
>
> DKC
>
>
>
> On 2014/6/3, 10:12, Jason Szumlanski wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> I can't identify your hardware, but I just wanted to comment on your 
>> comment about hitting rafters. There are products out there that can 
>> obtain the requisite load ratings without connecting directly to 
>> structural members. We have had systems engineered and permitted 
>> using Ecofasten products on low-slope roofs that fasten only to wood 
>> sheathing or metal roof materials in 170 mph zones in Florida (ASCE 
>> 7-10, FBC 2010). I'm not an engineer, but I've been told if there is 
>> adequate data on pull-out and shear, you can use that data to 
>> properly design a system without hitting rafters with the right 
>> number of attachment points. I don't like the looks of what you 
>> pictured, but it's plausible that it was an engineered system design. 
>> The permit drawings not matching... that is another story...
>>
>> If, for example, each of the six fasteners provide 100 pounds of 
>> pullout strength with a safety factor, that would be good for 12 sq 
>> ft at 50 spf uplift per attachment. 250 fasteners would be good for 
>> about 5kW of solar.
>>
>> Jason Szumlanski
>>
>> Fafco Solar
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Dave Click <daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu 
>> <mailto:daveclick at fsec.ucf.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     Anyone know what this racking system is? The permit drawings say
>>     Unirac with lag screws and Eco-Fasten flashings, which this
>>     pretty clearly isn't. I'd never seen this before, and I imagine
>>     this wind resistance is not quite the 140 mph that the installer
>>     claims it is. Of the ~250 wood screws holding this system down
>>     into the roof, I think six of them accidentally hit rafters.
>>
>>     Thanks!
>>     Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>>
>> List Address:RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>
>> Change email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List-Archive:http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>>
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20140626/aa9e0335/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list