[RE-wrenches] Cal Fire Residential Access
John Stimac
john at renewableassociates.com
Mon Sep 15 14:07:15 PDT 2014
Could someone help clarify the fire access requirements as stated in the Cal
Fire Code? (Text below)
It's my understanding that regardless of hips, valleys or a building with a
single ridge each roof plane with modules requires a 3' eave to ridge clear
access pathway and a 3' setback from the ridge to the top edge of the solar
array for ventilation requirements.
My questions:
1. Does the 3' ventilation setback requirement need to be clear of
obstructions?
2. Would a cross-gable roof, which has two ridges, require only one access
pathway alongside the array regardless of where the second ridge is located?
3. Does the single ridge requirement apply to a building with a single ridge
and a dormer?
4. A cross-gable roof would require a single 3' access pathway along one
side but because this can be on either side of the array, one side of the
array could be right up to the left or right roof edge as long as there is
3' on the other side, correct?
5. Does a roof surface with a valley and a hip (cross-hipped) still need to
have at least one 3' access pathway along one side of the array?
For the last one I understand that if there are no modules on the adjacent
roof the modules do not need to be 18" from the hip/valley but do you still
need at least one 3' access pathway on that roof plane?
I have read Bill Brooks guideline on this but some of the jurisdictions we
are working with have different ways of interpreting the requirements.
Thanks!
Code
605.11.3.2.1 Residential buildings with hip roof
layouts. Panels/modules installed on residential
buildings with hip roof layouts shall be located in a
manner that provides a 3-foot-wide (914 mm) clear
access pathway from the eave to the ridge on each
roof slope where panels/modules are located. The
access pathway shall be located at a structurally
strong location on the building capable of supporting
the live load of fire fighters accessing the roof.
Exception: These requirements shall not apply
to roofs with slopes of two units vertical in 12
units horizontal (2: 12) or less.
605.11.3.2.2 Residential buildings with a single
ridge. Panels/modules installed on residential buildings
with a single ridge shall be located in a manner
that provides two, 3-foot-wide (914 mm) access
pathways from the eave to the ridge on each roof
slope where panels/modules are located.
Exception: This requirement shall not apply to
roofs with slopes of two units vertical in 12 units
horizontal (2: 12) or less.
605.11.3.2.3 Residential buildings with roof hips
and valleys. Panels/modules installed on residential
buildings with roof hips and valleys shall be located
no closer than 18 inches (457 mm) to a hip or a valley
where panels/modules are to be placed on both
sides of a hip or valley. Where panels are to be
located on only one side of a hip or valley that is of
equal length, the panels shall be permitted to be
placed directly adjacent to the hip or valley.
Exception: These requirements shall not apply
to roofs with slopes of two units vertical in 12
units horizontal (2: 12) or less.
605.11.3.2.4 Residential building smoke ventilation.
Panels/modules installed on residential buildings
shall be located no higher than 3 feet (914 mm)
below the ridge in order to allow for fire department
smoke ventilation operations.
--
John Stimac | Corvallis, OR
Renewable Energy Associates LLC
541-754-2001 Office/Fax
<mailto:john at renewableassociates.com> john at renewableassociates.com
<http://www.renewableassociates.com/> www.renewableassociates.com
REAL_logo_black2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20140915/23e9e113/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5932 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20140915/23e9e113/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list