[RE-wrenches] PV Wiring methods

Ray Walters ray at solarray.com
Thu Nov 14 17:46:01 PST 2013


I definitely think cable tray is a good compromise between conduit and 
loose zip tie wiring; I primarily question rodent protection.
Even cable trays can go horribly wrong:  I've seen them not supported 
properly and bend or even fall over spilling cables onto the roof or ground.

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 11/14/2013 5:27 PM, Bill Brooks wrote:
>
> William,
>
> I know your long-time stance on conduit. It has its place. This report 
> was about an integrated PV system that caught fire because of a module 
> failure---this was not a cable management issue. We can all jump on 
> our respective soap boxes and pontificate---I have no problem with that.
>
> I don't think you are correct on either reason for "lax wire standards".
>
> 1.When 12- and 24-V systems were done, they were all in conduit until 
> post 2000 when cable and connector systems began to be used. Not the 
> reason for lax standards.
>
> 2.Cable management is not more lax in Europe. You typical German 
> electrician (far more competent than your average American 
> electrician), works with exterior cabling systems all the time in ac 
> wiring. They do beautiful work in general---there are always 
> exceptions to every generalization, but we have a lot to learn from them.
>
> Lastly---conduit systems on large rooftop PV systems have proven to be 
> very problematic to the point where I would not recommend the use of 
> metallic conduit on feeders longer than 200-feet. Everything should be 
> in cable tray.
>
> Down off my soapbox---with all respect in the world to you. Hop up 
> again if you please.
>
> Bill.
>
> *From:* re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org 
> [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *William Miller
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:42 PM
> *To:* 'RE-wrenches'
> *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] PV Wiring methods
>
> Bill:
>
> I respectfully disagree with your logic:  Define "perfectly 
> installed."  If your connections are tight and permanent and the 
> conductors are protected from damage, you have a great chance of a 
> reliable, safe lifetime of service.  How can you guarantee that your 
> leads will stay protected after the ties fail?  Studies show that even 
> UV resistant wire ties will fail well before the life expectancy of 
> the system has expired.  When the ties fail, your PV leads are hanging 
> on the roof.  Even before the ties fail, rodents can chew on them.  
> Conduit was invented for a reason and we should be using it.
>
> I agree that arc-fault breakers will improve the situation, but I 
> don't think any form of OCPD is a substitute for good wiring 
> practices.  I think wire protection is just as important on PV 
> circuits as it is on any other high voltage circuit.  Try getting away 
> with wiring a rooftop air conditioning unit by tying the conductors to 
> some metal framework with plastic ties and see how long it takes to 
> get red-tagged by your local inspector.
>
> I suspect we've gotten to where we are on lax wire protection 
> standards for two reasons:
>
> 1.In the early days, PV was low voltage, 12 to 24 volts, and was 
> treated as such, even though current capabilities exceeded that of 
> conventional low voltage thermostat, door-bell and telephone wiring.
>
> 2.It is my understanding that PV wiring standards in Europe are not 
> stringent, and European demand drove the PV market for many years.  
> Products were built to satisfy the European market and US standards 
> had to work with the equipment available.
>
> Some would say: "if it is under the array, it is protected."  We have 
> seen PV wire getting damaged under arrays and it is possible to get 
> damaged under BPIV components as well.  I believe that protecting PV 
> wire is more  important than protecting conventional AC circuit wiring 
> because PV circuits are more prone to create and sustain arcing.
>
> Some say that protecting PV wire in conduits will add too much expense 
> to PV installations.  Consider the cost of fires and, inevitably, 
> injuries and deaths.  One news story about an obscure, rarely used 
> product is already causing many of us headaches.  Statistically, it is 
> inevitable that more accidents will happen. I don't want that on my 
> conscience.
>
> I would suggest that we need to expand the discussion beyond fire 
> hazards.  I also worry about electrocution hazards in high voltage PV 
> circuits. Good wire protection is essential in preventing contact with 
> high voltages.
>
> Unprotected PV wiring is an irresponsible practice.  I am fighting an 
> uphill battle to develops methods to protect PV wiring because the 
> industry is not helping at all.  The trend has been to make it harder 
> to protect wiring.  This trend will result in accidents.  I think we 
> should do better.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Miller
>
> *From:*re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org 
> <mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org> 
> [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *Bill 
> Brooks
> *Sent:* Monday, November 11, 2013 3:38 PM
> *To:* 'RE-wrenches'
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] RE-wrenches Digest, Vol 6, Issue 423
>
> William and David,
>
> This particular problem goes away with arc fault detection. The longer 
> we wait to introduce arc fault detection into our systems, the more we 
> will have opportunities for news reports such as the one William 
> brings forward. Wire ties are not the problem. Could a wire tie cause 
> a problem-sure, just like anything improperly installed.
>
> At the end of the day, you can a have a perfectly installed system, 
> but if it does not have arc fault detection and high resolution ground 
> fault detection, it can still catch on fire. You have no control over 
> product failures other than buying from large companies that can 
> actually insure their products in a failure.
>
> Fires are not that common, but it didn't take much to get all the 
> viewers of this news report up in arms did it?
>
> Bill.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20131114/b24a00d0/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list