[RE-wrenches] Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment

Steven Lawrence lawrencesteven at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 12:45:27 PST 2013


 The state of NJ has rules that PV modules do not require regular
maintenance thus the clearance rules and access do not apply.  It's
somewhere in the construction code communicator of 2008-2010.

It maybe not exactly what you're looking for, but maybe it'll help.



> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:44:31 -0500
> From: Jason Szumlanski <jason at fafcosolar.com>
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Are PV Systems Mechanical Equipment?
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJJtG3qj7sVpjD-=
> W1YnBN7dckd9wB9zLo673W+dD6x7af74+g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> The Florida Building Code definitions of "equipment" and "appliances" in
> the Mechanical Code do not include solar arrays, yet some building
> officials insist on applying provisions of the mechanical code.
> Specifically, we get quite a few comments about mounting height above the
> roof and permanent access ladders and platforms. What is your experience in
> your state, and do you consider solar arrays to be "mechanical equipment."
>
> (If you have any ammo specific to FBC 2010 that I can use, I'd be happy to
> get your thoughts off-list).
>
> *Jason Szumlanski** *
>
> *Fafco Solar*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20130201/bddab8de/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list