[RE-wrenches] Low power production at a winery: DC voltage drop upon SB6000 start-up
Exeltech
exeltech at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 22 10:32:52 PDT 2012
Allan's point is well taken.
Resistive connections within the PV could easily be another cause for
excessive DC-side voltage drop, and clearly merits closer examination.
Dan
--- On Sun, 7/22/12, Allan Sindelar <allan at positiveenergysolar.com> wrote:
From: Allan Sindelar <allan at positiveenergysolar.com>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Low power production at a winery: DC voltage drop upon SB6000 start-up
To: "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
Date: Sunday, July 22, 2012, 12:25 PM
Eric,
Without challenging any of Dan's calculations, I will add that the
BP SX170 has proven to be prone to failures. You didn't indicate
which model of BP170 you have. I think that the SX170s are the
model that was the source of BP's conditional recall of modules
that could cause roof fires - no, I'm not making this up, but
neither is my memory sharp about this.
Here's the text of an email dated 10/10/07 from Phil Undercuffler,
now at Outback, then at Conergy:
BP reports that these failures tend to manifest early in the product
life; modules that will have problems will generally fail in the first
few years of service. Failure rates are reported as .02% of product
distributed in US, .03% in European market
Cause:
The solder joint inside the low-profile potted J-box on MC connected
modules is what is failing.
Changes in solder formulation (due to the phase out of lead solder
for environmental reasons) and move to heavier gauge wire made it
harder to make a good solder joint.
Failure of the solder joint causes heating and arcing, which can in
certain cases ignite the epoxy material surrounding the joint.
BP's concern is the potential for the burning epoxy to ignite
flammable materials in the close vicinity of the junction box.
BP does not believe that standard roofing materials such as asphalt
shingles, tile or metal roofs will be affected by this issue.
A dealer can perform tests with a relatively inexpensive infrared
thermometer or contact thermal probe. It is best to measure the
module from the front, while in operation.
Problem modules will show 10-20 C difference between the solder
joint and the module field just before failure.
For solder connection, gather the following info:
Measure VOC and ISC
Physical examination, looking for brown or black spots on
solder traces
Model number
Serial number
They are rated at +/- 9%, one of the worst specs around at that
time. We used quite a few of them at that time and have replaced
many of them under warranty, including one entire 40-module
commercial array, identical to the one you described.
I would still encourage testing individual string outputs for Vmp
and Imp under load, to look for significant variances. At worst,
it gives you a baseline reading. Also, if you can, look for
browned hot spots, visible beneath he glass in the area over where
the leads leave the module back.
Allan
Allan Sindelar
Allan at positiveenergysolar.com
NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic
Installer
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder and Chief Technology Officer
Positive Energy, Inc.
3209 Richards Lane (note new address)
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
505 424-1112
www.positiveenergysolar.com
On 7/22/2012 10:56 AM, Exeltech wrote:
Eric,
I checked my magic spreadsheet for the BP SX170.
Using 800W/m^2 irradiance, and a presumed ambient of 37C
(98F),
everything appears to be working within specified
tolerances. The
presumed conditions create exactly your measured Voc,
which is
why I used them. Other temperature and irradiance
combinations
will also work...
The voltage delta you measured between Voc and Vmpp is
within
BP's specifications. No PV has a perfect "fill factor".
Fill factor is the
aspect that determines the shape of the V/I curve
established when
Voc and Vmpp are plotted. The BP you mentioned have a
fill factor of
0.769, which is very typical of polycrystalline PV. A
perfect fill factor
would be 1.0 (Vmpp equal to Voc), which obviously doesn't
happen.
Thus, all PV have an operating voltage at maximum power
that's below
the open circuit voltage -- some more than others.
Measured:
375Voc
280V at inverter at mpp
14-15A (fluctuating) at mpp
Calculated:
375Voc
301V mpp
14.96A mpp
Assumed:
800 w/m^2
37C (98F) amb
4,503W array power under above conditions
280V measured at the inverter
14.5A
Presuming 301V is correct Vmpp, this equates to:
1.38 ohms total system R, and 290W loss
290W/4503W = 6.44%
6.44% total loss --higher than a 2.5-3% best-practices
target, and likely
due to slightly oxidized and/or loose connections in the
DC-side of the
system. Could also be due to long conductor runs,
slightly undersized
conductors for the amperage and length, or both.
As Jeff Quackenbush mentioned, Vmpp is slighly lower than
one might
expect, but doesn't appear to rise to the level of
something that would
yet be indicative of something wrong.
Dan
--- On Sat, 7/21/12, SunHarvest <eric at harvesthesun.com>
wrote:
From: SunHarvest <eric at harvesthesun.com>
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Low power production at a winery:
DC voltage drop upon SB6000 start-up
To: "RE-wrenches"
<re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
Date: Saturday, July 21, 2012, 3:19 PM
Hello Wrenches,
I am helping a
client troubleshoot a complaint about
underproduction of his on-grid system installed
about 6-8 years ago. At first I thought I might
encounter the bad Kyocera KC120 issue but it
turns out they have BP170's, 40 of them for an
STC power rating of 6.8kW.
Ratings of the BP
modules: PTC=150.7, Vmp=35.4, Voc=44.2, Imp=4.8,
Isc=5
The system has four
panels of ten modules wired in series for a
nominal rating of about 350v, 4.8a per string.
At the DC
disconnect (first accessible combiner) I
measured: All strings right at about 375v(oc),
4.7a(mp). After the strings are combined, at the
DC input of the SB6000 (with the AC power to the
inverter OFF) I measured about 375V as expected.
Once the AC power is connected, the
SB6000 starts up, and MPP operation is
initiated, the DC voltage drops to about 280V,
and amps sit between 14 & 15A. I didn't
think the voltage was supposed to drop upon MPP
tracking...especially this much. This voltage
drop would account for the observed power loss
between actual and rated production values. I'm
going to check with SMA but I wanted to ask the
experts here too, as someone may advise
something like, "Oh yeah, BP modules have a
similar defect as the Kyocera..."
My questions:
Is the DC voltage
supposed to drop significantly in MPP mode on
these inverters?
If not, does this
indicate a bad inverter?
Anyone know of problems with BP modules
manufactured around 2006-2008?
The Kyocera modules
showed good volts and amps until a load was
connected. Seems like a similar issue here.
Eric Stikes
SunHarvest Solar
A Sustainable Energy Group Partner
+1 (530) 798 - 3738
www.harvesthesun.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20120722/6e92696f/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list