[RE-wrenches] AC wiring loss on micro-inverters
Kirk Herander, VSE
kirk at vtsolar.com
Fri Jun 11 13:47:50 PDT 2010
I guess all this does is effectively reduce the number of inverters in each
string, and create two strings from one (but without additional homerun
string wiring). So you need two factory pigtails instead of one for each
"original" string for the center tap j-box, but a small price to pay for
increased system efficiency. Good idea.
Kirk Herander
Vermont Solar Engineering
802.863.1202
NABCEP(tm) Certified Solar Installer
NYSERDA-eligible Installer
VT Solar Incentive Program Partner
_____
From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of David
Brearley
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 4:04 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] AC wiring loss on micro-inverters
Maybe Marv can help out here. I've talked with tech support at Enphase and
am under the impression that you can center tap their branch circuits to
reduce voltage drop. This technique was used on a project that we profiled
in SolarPro:
http://solarprofessional.com/article/?file=SP3_2_pg92_Projects_1
<http://solarprofessional.com/article/?file=SP3_2_pg92_Projects_1&search=>
&search=
David Brearley, Senior Technical Editor
SolarPro magazine
On 6/11/10 2:50 PM, "Nick Soleil" <nicksoleilsolar at yahoo.com> wrote:
Did you notice that in my calculation I divided the total amperage by 2 to
get the average ampacity across the string. This seems to be the best way
to deal with that. Otherwise the loss would have been over 2.8%
Nick Soleil
Project Manager
Advanced Alternative Energy Solutions, LLC
PO Box 657
Petaluma, CA 94953
Cell: 707-321-2937
Office: 707-789-9537
Fax: 707-769-9037
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20100611/cc614e3f/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list