[RE-wrenches] Fire Fighters
Dan Fink
danbob at hughes.net
Tue Dec 14 17:29:39 PST 2010
Andrew;
I think that in the future, the solution to the dilemma of entire roof
aspects fully covered in PV vs. firefighter safety is going to be
module-level control. Some shade mitigation systems already have it,
including an "all stop" button at the system control center. I hope some
electronic nerd somewhere is working on an inexpensive automated module
safety cutout. If the unit cost were low enough, the economics might
work out.
My fire department had to cut through a roof for ventilation in high
winds just last week. It's horrible, dangerous work, and having access
to the right location on the lee side, and a quick and safe escape
route, are essential.
DAN FINK
Buckville Energy Consulting LLC
IREC/ISPQ accredited Continuing Education Provider
andrew at solarenergyoregon.com wrote:
> While the Content of the CalFire info is amazingly extensive, and the
> intentions behind it unequivocally laudable, where it limits rooftop
> availability of PVs, it is not so great and a needless catastrophic blow
> to the advancement of the photovoltaic industry in the United States of
> America. If the industry does not get its thoughts together around
> firefighter safety and rooftop availability for solar from a more
> solarcentric perspective, we will see more bad code like that recently
> passed in Oregon spread throughout the nation, well... like fire, that
> all but outlaws the installation of far too many residential systems.
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
> Andrew Koyaanisqatsi
> President
> Solar Energy Solutions, Inc.
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list