[RE-wrenches] Enphase comparison

Tump tump at hughes.net
Wed Jul 22 14:45:38 PDT 2009


install time was A BIT better, layout took some time & as usual the tying up
of cables is what takes the longest. What really sucks is the wait time
between selling them then not being able to get them. They say this will
soon be a thing of the past....... still waiting. That being said the folks
at Enphase are quite helpful.
I'm not sure about the inverters rated performance according to the CEC.
 
 
     <mailto:Tump at swnl.net> Tump at swnl.net         <http://www.swnl.net/>
www.SWNL.net
           Solarwinds Northernlights   
   Serving Mid Coast Maine & Northern California
     Me.# 207-832-7574  Cl.#  610-517-8401
 
                          Blair "TUMP" May
      ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
            NABCEP    "Certified PV Installer" 
   
      ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
   Trace Xantrex "Certified" Dealer / Installer"
   
  

-----Original Message-----
From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Mangelsdorf
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:31 AM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Enphase comparison



To those of you who have installed PV systems in, say, the 2-4 kW range
using Enphase inverters, how would you compare the labor time and
installation materials (wire, conduit, hardware, etc.)  to a standard system
design using a single inverter?

 

Longer?  Shorter?  More or less materials?  If either, by what percentage?

 

Thanks,

Marco

ProVision

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20090722/f66217ec/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list