[RE-wrenches] Strings and series of batteries with reversereturn linkup
Joel Davidson
joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net
Fri Dec 4 18:52:43 PST 2009
Here's some good info:
http://photovoltaics.sandia.gov/docs/battery1.htm
or
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp;jsessionid=CC366D87BBE1C7C3BCBEEAFD87A3D0D7?purl=/402426-htwdT8/webviewable/
or
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/125071-E7W1qQ/webviewable/
Joel Davidson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Elliot" <telliot at wagonmaker.com>
To: "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Strings and series of batteries with
reversereturn linkup
>I would love to see some studies on that Michael. I do know that I saw
>none of the supposed problems of paralleling more than just 2 or 3 series
>strings and the batteries have lasted far longer than the original L-16s
>did in a "traditional" bank even though there are 12 strings paralleled
>together.
>
> I do know that the engineer I spoke with at length so many years ago was
> quite specific about there being a significant difference in how such a
> system functioned using bus bars over interconnected terminals but I
> cannot remember the specifics of his reasoning.
>
> I do recall quite clearly the telco installers saying, more than once,
> that paralleling strings the way we always did was "nuts" and they
> couldn't understand why we did it that way.
>
> Maybe Jamie has more specifics.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Michael Welch" <michael.welch at re-wrenches.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:55 AM
> To: "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Strings and series of batteries with reverse
> return linkup
>
>> Yes, the bus bar technique will always add 1 cable and 2 connection
>> points. And extra cost.
>>
>> As far as I can see and from what I have read in this thread, the only
>> advantage to the bus bar method is absolutely equal interconnection
>> resistances for all the strings. Maybe this advantage is only be useful
>> for those that put many strings of batteries in parallel. Not so
>> important when one has only 2-3 strings, the max that most folks
>> recommend.
>>
>> But if appropriately large enough cable is used in a conventional cabling
>> method for 2-3 strings, my gut says the resistance differences should be
>> marginalized to the point of irrelevance.
>>
>> As Kent points out, internal resistance is a differentiating factor which
>> cannot be fully controlled, a factor of greater concern that seems to
>> further marginalize the value of bus bars and equal cable lengths.
>>
>> To me, this discussion seems really important. The opinions here are
>> varied, but if the results are real, significant, and verifiable, we will
>> all want to become proponents of this method.
>>
>> Jamie, Rob, & Tom: Have there been any studies done comparing those two
>> techniques, or is this something that has been passed down over
>> generations in the battery industry?
>>
>> (BTW, my very first bank of batteries was situated such that I bolted the
>> string ends directly to pieces of copper flat stock, 1 for each string
>> polarity -- no cables, except to the load. The best of all worlds, I
>> suppose.)
>>
>> William Miller wrote at 10:53 AM 12/4/2009:
>>
>>>Colleagues:
>>>
>>>I found Tom Elliot's buss bar solution intriguing, but instinctively
>>>something bothered me about it. Although I like fondling wiring hardware
>>>as much as any of us, this procedure seemed to unnecessarily complicate
>>>the battery cabling system. Each added cable and each added connection
>>>point contributes actual resistance and potential problems.
>>>
>>>I undertook to simplify this into an electronic circuit with each cable
>>>represented by a resistor (which it is) and at the same time providing a
>>>clear depiction in which one can count the cables and connection points
>>>for each of a number of battery strings. The result is a simple PDF
>>>drawing on our web site: http://millersolar.com Go to "Case Studies"
>>>and find Battery Wiring Options as the last entry. I welcome each of you
>>>to poke holes in my analysis, graphics and/or analysis.
>>>
>>>Please note the balance achieved in both systems. The merits then lie in
>>>the actual number of cables and connection points, IMHO. Lastly,
>>>consider the labor and materials required in a either installation.
>>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>
>>>William Miller
>>>
>>>PS: I have a pathological dislike of splices or connections that are not
>>>mounted to a surface -- when secured you always know where they are and
>>>they are easy to get a probe on. This is why we use power distribution
>>>blocks whenever possible. Polaris connectors in a battery compartment
>>>don't seem right -- they could easily trap corrosive fumes and hide
>>>corrosion problems from view.
>>>
>>>Wm
>>>
>>>
>>>At 09:59 AM 12/4/2009, you wrote:
>>>>Hi Kent,
>>>>
>>>>I am sorry but I disagree with your conclusion that it only keeps the
>>>>wire resistances the same for 2 strings. This diagonal system, which I
>>>>believe many people would call 'reverse return' in the states, actually
>>>>provides for exactly equal resistance on all paths to all strings. Each
>>>>time you add a link in the positive path you remove one in the negative
>>>>path. I admit that the voltage drops will be very slightly different
>>>>due to different currents in the various links but the differences now
>>>>are so tiny that I would not worry about them.
>>>>
>>>>I agree that you will get imbalances in multiple battery strings at
>>>>times - usually during periods of prolonged low winds. But you cannot
>>>>persuade me that multiple strings 'don't work right' because they are
>>>>used in most of the systems I work with since the 1970s. I see just as
>>>>much sulphation in large capacity cells as I do in small capacity cells
>>>>(in multiple parallel strings). I would say that going from 12-volts on
>>>>up to 48-volt systems has caused me a lot more headaches with unequal
>>>>battery states than paralleling a lot of batteries has. Batteries
>>>>connected in parallel will tend to take what they need. Connected in
>>>>series they take what they are given. Also, a cell failure in a 12-volt
>>>>system attracts attention at once, whereas a cell failure in a 48-volt
>>>>system can be overlooked for much longer.
>>>>
>>>>There are plenty of points of view about batteries :-) Part of it is
>>>>the difference in mentality between solar users (who count out the amp
>>>>hours and know exactly what they have to work with each day) and wind
>>>>users (who can party like mad sometimes and then have nothing at other
>>>>times).
>>>>
>>>>Hugh
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>>>
>>>List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>>
>>>Options & settings:
>>>http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>>
>>>List-Archive:
>>>http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>>
>>>List rules & etiquette:
>>>www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>>
>>>Check out participant bios:
>>>www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>>
>> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>>
>> Options & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List-Archive:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.93/2544 - Release Date:
>> 12/03/09 21:32:00
>>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list