[RE-wrenches] Solar Boost Controller in Senegal

Bob-O Schultze bob-o at electronconnection.com
Tue Jun 30 07:13:37 PDT 2009


alt,
In addition to those possible replacement controllers you mentioned,  
you might add the BZ MPPT 500 to the list. I've had a few issues with  
them but that seems to have mostly sorted itself out. Very reasonably  
priced for a MPPT controller, 100 Voc input. The catch is you've got a  
500W output limit.
Bob-O

On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:26 AM, Walt Ratterman wrote:

Hello all,

Thanks to all of your responses, and particularly Rick’s confirmation  
of the appropriate ranges for the SB50, it has become clear that these  
panels can not be made to work with the SB50, and that the SB50 was  
the wrong choice for these pre-fabricated systems, or perhaps better  
phrased, the panels were the wrong choice for the controller.   
Actually, it is probably more accurate that the panels were the wrong  
choice because their characteristics severely limit the possible  
options of what to do next.

I would like your input on what you think should be done here.

Nine systems were purchased from Earthwalk.  One has been deployed for  
four months.  A second unit is being deployed now.  This leaves seven  
in the warehouse.  (And we wont even get into the fact that we have  
AGM batteries here instead of the advertised GEL batteries, and the  
voltage is so low they might not even work……I will deal with that  
separately…..)

While it is clear that the panels do not match up with the controller,  
it is not clear why they are still working (other than the heat and  
dirt) and if they will continue to work.

One solution would be to just leave everything alone and tell them  
what they should do if the system(s) fail.  In some cases, this might  
be the right action to take.  But in this case, I think the folks who  
sold the prefabricated unit should be held accountable, and provide a  
system that is designed to work properly.  The schools paid good money  
for this equipment and they should at least have a running start at  
success, which is difficult to come by in this part of the world on a  
good day.

So – when we tell the schools to insist that the system be fixed,  
what do you think we should tell them?

Due to the characteristics of the panel (not being either 12V or 24V  
nominal) they need a MPPT controller.  I suppose we could tell them to  
change to a controller that will accept the output of the panel.  This  
would be either Outback, Midnite Solar, or possibly the new  
Morningstar 15A controller.  Any suggestions?

The other route would be to have them change the panels, and keep the  
prefabricated system as it is.  Rick:  what would you recommend the  
best voltage / current combination to replicate the need for a 440 to  
500 watt peak array output with the SB50?

Given the relative cost of the panels versus the controller, the  
manufacturer may likely decide to switch the controllers, but it is  
not as easy as it sounds.  If either the Outback or Midnite  
controllers are used, they will not fit into the small space the  
cabinet allowed for the SB50.  But I will deal with that another way.   
(We will just build an all new cabinet here in Senegal).

So – any ideas or thoughts I have missed are welcome!!

Thanks so much for all of the great feedback.  I think, like most of  
us, every day is a learning experience, even if we think we have done  
this 100 times before.

Take care,

Walt

From: Rick Cullen - Blue Sky Energy, Inc. [mailto:rick at blueskyenergyinc.com 
]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:14 AM
To: wratterman at sunenergypower.com; 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: RE: [RE-wrenches] Solar Boost Controller in Senegal

Hello Everyone,

The SB50's maximum input voltage spec it 57VDC. This should be  
considered an absolute maximum above which the controller will be  
damaged in a manner not covered by warranty. Our recommendation is to  
not apply a total Voc at STC of more than 57V/1.25= 45.6V. There are  
transient voltage protection diodes on both battery and PV inputs on  
ALL Solar Boost charge controllers. These are not "tell tail"  
indicators but real protection devices designed/selected to protect  
down stream electronics from transient voltage damage resulting from  
ESD, lightning, etc. On the PV side of the SB50 the protection diodes  
will begin to clip at about 58-60V. They can eat a 1 millisecond 3000W  
transient without damage, but will burn up if they receive more than  
about 10W continuously. These two diodes are located right behind the  
PV terminals.

In the application described below I would expect the SB50 to be  
damaged. What typically happens with excess over voltage is the diodes  
fail short, and then clamp PV voltage low and protect the down stream  
electronics. If PV current is sufficiently high the diodes will burn  
open and the SB50 may continue to operate since down stream devices  
have somewhat higher voltage withstand capability, or it may suffer  
catastrophic damage.

Why these systems continue to operate must be due to actual Voc not  
getting high enough long enough to cause catastrophic damage. If the  
controllers were to not switch to Float (unloading the PV's), the  
brief Voc sample as part of MPPT may not have burned up the diodes and  
they are successfully eating the excess voltage transients which would  
seem to occur during the Voc sample. It may also be that the modules  
are so hot that their actual Voc & Vmp are low enough that when PV  
voltage is clamped to 60V by the SB50's protection diodes insufficient  
power is delivered at 60V to burn up the diodes...

Needless to say, this is a situation that need to be corrected.  
Technical Bulletin #100214 available on our web site describes proper  
voltage, current and power sizing for all Solar Boost charge  
controllers.

Regards,
Richard A. Cullen
Blue Sky Energy, Inc.
760-597-1642 x102
fax 760-597-1731
rick at blueskyenergyinc.com
www.blueskyenergyinc.com


From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org 
] On Behalf Of Walt Ratterman
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 3:22 PM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Solar Boost Controller in Senegal

Hello,

I am in a very remote part of Senegal, (near the Guinea  and Mali  
borders…) and I have come across some prefabricated “plug and  
play” American made systems installed for educational institutions.

The systems use two Sharp panels that are 220Watts, 33.6 Voc, 29.2  
Vmp, wired in series, using #10AWG home run wire from the panels back  
to the charge controller.

Charge Controller is a Solar Boost 50.

Batteries are Dekka AGM – two strings of 250AH, 12V batteries.  (four  
batteries total).

My specific question is about the controller.  This is a 24V in / 24V  
out charge controller with MPPT.  I have not used this before, so I am  
not familiar with the details of operation.

The data sheet that I downloaded says that the maximum open circuit  
voltage is 57 VDC.  But, this system is hitting the charge controller  
with two panels of 33.6 VDC wired in series for 73.2VDC.  So, why is  
the controller not fried, or what am I seeing wrong here.  I suppose  
with the panel temperature being elevated maybe 35 degrees above 25  
degrees and a resulting 17.5% loss, coupled with some voltage drop,  
the system may actually be seeing less than the 57 volts.

But…..isnt this a dangerous way to design a system?  (it will get  
cooler here ….)

Or am I missing something?

What would be the appropriate application here….

Sorry, I cant do a lot of internet research from here – limited  
download capability on the satellite….

Thanks!!

Walt

Walt Ratterman
SunEnergy Power International

11 Laurel Lane South     Washougal, WA   98671
(360)-837-3680   ▪   fax (360)-837-1315   ▪   Skype  Walt-Mobile
wratterman at SunEPI.org   ▪   www.SunEPI.org




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus  
signature database 4193 (20090626) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus  
signature database 4193 (20090626) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20090630/6bafc2cb/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list