[RE-wrenches] crystalline VS uni-solar and beyond
Bill Brooks
billbrooks7 at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 4 11:10:39 PST 2008
Michael,
So how many times do they have to replace the modules to get 10% more
energy....;-)
Bill.
-----Original Message-----
From: re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-bounces at lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Welch
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:54 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] crystalline VS uni-solar and beyond
Michael Welch wrote at 09:32 AM 11/4/2008:
>3. The amorphous modules performed 4% less than the crystalline -- until
Uni-Solar replaced the modules a couple of years back, and now they
outperform the crystalline modules by about 4%.
Dangit. That last figure is 2%, for outperforming the crystalline after the
Uni-Solar replacements.
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches at lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list