Module wiring safety [RE-wrenches]
Joel Davidson
joel.davidson at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jan 22 08:45:42 PST 2008
<x-flowed>
There are very few high voltage (Class II) PV systems in the U.S.
Grid-connected PV is part of the grid distribution system. Unless the PV
system is behind a fence, many, if not most, grid-connected PV systems feed
back to the grid through wire in conduit and then to overhead or underground
wire not in conduit. Solar module interconnect wiring and quick-connects
that are neatly tied almost always pass inspection in southern California.
Roof-mounted homeruns and other accessible wiring are another story. Some
inspectors in So-Cal allow PVC conduit. Some require EMT. Some want threaded
pipe. An inspector can judge any part of a PV system an "attractive
nuisance" (real estate term describing a condition that can attract and
injure children).
This discussion is interesting and a chance to complain about PV module
manufacturers' failure to give U.S. customers what they want (j-boxes).
However, I am concerned that the end result will be more Code requirements
and added cost. In the meantime, Europeans are installing gigawatts of PV up
to 1,000 volts DC running through double-insulated wire with no conduit
while the U.S. PV industry perpetuates "there aught to be a law" mentality.
Brothers and sisters, there's a world of difference between more laws and
more freedom.
Joel Davidson
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Miller"
To: <RE-wrenches at topica.com>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: Module wiring safety [RE-wrenches]
>
> Friends:
>
> I guess there is one fundamental question (at least as I see it): 1. Are
> high voltage wires safe when not enclosed in conduit?
>
> In addition, some are asking: 2. Are PV installers being held to a higher
> standard than for other electrical installations (or at least, will they
> be under the 2008 code)?
>
> I think the obvious answers are no and no.
>
> Take a look at question 2 first: What other electrical system can any of
> you cite that allows high voltage wire to be exposed to the general public
> and not be protected by conduit? I can not think of one. Try running a
> branch circuit in THHN stapled to the outside of your next job and see if
> it passes inspection. Heck, it's not even allowed inside a wall. You
> have to use jacketed cable and only for limited applications. So, no,
> enclosing high voltage wire in conduit is not unique to the 2008 PV code.
>
> Further, if electrical installations of any type accessible by the general
> public require conduit and have for decades, why is this? Well I surmise
> that it is because high voltage electricity is DANGEROUS! That answers
> question number 1.
>
> No, I can not cite an example of someone being killed by a PV system, but
> you can't deny it is possible, and do you want your system to be the first
> one? I fear that the human involved will not be the only fatality-- so
> will the industry. Envision your next 100 or more residential sales calls
> after this hits the news. Again, that fatality may never happen, but I
> can't understand the resistance to making damn sure it doesn't. I'm in
> favor of the industry regulating itself, but that has to occur before the
> accident.
>
> Also, the era of high voltage string arrays has been with us for only a
> few years. So if your logic is based on the statement, "No one has been
> killed yet," that is not logic, that's gambling.
>
> What gets me is that the bottom line here appears to be: the bottom line.
> Many are apparently under the impression that exposed wiring is
> significantly cheaper than protected wiring so they will fight tooth and
> nail to maintain this practice. With module J-boxes and a little
> experimentation, we were able to do it cheaper, faster and better.
>
> I'm all for an industry task force to review the options, but I think this
> has happened already and the report is out-- it's in the 2008 code. I
> suggest we not fight it but embrace it for the wisdom it is.
>
> William Miller
- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list