Fire Department Setback warning [RE-wrenches]
Matt Tritt
solarone at charter.net
Thu May 15 10:08:07 PDT 2008
<x-flowed>
I'm probably not going to win any populararity contests by saying this,
but - If we can divorce ourselves from the position of our industry and
see things from the perspective of a firefighter's (relative) safety
while attempting to save someone's house from burning to the ground,
setbacks seem very logical. Anyone who has ever fought fire or even
witnessed a crew chopping access holes in a roof to gain access to an
attic will realize that this would be virtually impossible if a PV array
were in the way. If you look at it from the perspective of an insurance
company, it's a no-brainer.
In the case of single family dwellings, the possibilities for ground or
trellis mounting systems can be very good, especially when the
alternative is no PV at all. We all depend on firefighters to take risks
to protect our property and doing what we can to increase their chances
of survival seems like the right thing to do.
Matt T
solarpro at aol.com wrote:
>Wrenches:
>
>The setback regs have been a pain for us. CalSeia has been working
>diligently to modify the rules for nearly two years now. You should visit the web
>site _www.calseia.org_ (http://www.calseia.org) , look at 'emergency response',
>view the pdfs that address setback standards and look over the proposed
>changes (draft PV Guidelines) that have been hashed out with the state fire
>marshall. This push for setbacks and pathways by your local fire fighters has
>reduced our options for solar on so many homes that we estimate our business
>potential has been reduced between 30 to 40% . These rules will not only
>curtail business in California, but are sure to spread like, well,
>er......wildfire... to other states as well.
>
>After you look over the web page on calseia's site and see how much we have
>been doing, you should immediately join CalSeia to help with these efforts and
> others, as we are becoming more and more regulated.
>
>Patrick Redgate
>AMECO
>
>
>
>
>In a message dated 5/14/2008 2:37:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>michael.welch at re-wrenches.org writes:
>
>
>Hi gang. Posting this on behalf of William Miller, his own post did not show
> up.
>
>
>
>>Friends:
>>
>>Well, it's happened. Local fire marshals are now enforcing roof edge
>>
>>
>setbacks. These setbacks originate from the Los Angeles Fire Department and
>require a 4 foot setback on all edges of a roof-- eaves, ridge and gables.
>
>
>>I have jobs pending that will not proceed because of these requirements. I
>>
>>
>am sure all of you installing roof mounted PV will find many jobs that are
>not feasible once these regulations spread to your area. This will be the
>single biggest curtailment of residential PV in the history of grid-tie
>solar-electric. I have reviewed a random sampling of recent roof mounted jobs and at
>least 90% of them would be either not at all feasible or greatly reduce in
>size.
>
>
>>We need to put our heads together and figure out a way to deal with this.
>>
>>
>Here is one idea: If a roof has an attic, it can be vented from the north
>side, therefore clearance issues on the south side should be waived. Here's
>another concept: The literature mentions "quick release" hardware. Can we
>invent racks that can fold over to create eave, ridge or gable clearances?
>
>
>>I am interested in any input on this critical issue. To view the
>>
>>
>regulations, it is the top listing at:
>
>
>>http://mpandc.com/resources/resources.html
>>
>>William Miller
>>
>>
>
>
>- - - -
>Hosted by Home Power magazine
>
>To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
>
>Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
>
>List rules & how to change your email address:
>www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
>
>Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
>
>Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
>favorites at AOL Food.
>(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>- - - -
>Hosted by Home Power magazine
>
>To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
>
>Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
>
>List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
>
>Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
>
>Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list