homework [RE-wrenches]

[William Miller]

<x-flowed>

Mark:

I apologize.  63.1 is not the angle of the modules, rather the angle of the 
line of incidence.  The module tilt angle would be 26.9.  Allowing for 
rounding, we might be in agreement.

BTW, my use of the term "line of incidence" would more correctly be the 
line of perpendicularity.

WM

At 07:30 PM 4/13/2008, you wrote:

>Humm,
>
>63 deg seem a bit steep to me....
>Perhaps we are not talking about the same geometry....
>But to get the same azimuth we would have to be...
>
>Anyone else out there want to put in a third data set?
>
>
>Mark Frye
>Berkeley Solar Electric Systems
>271 Vistamont Dr
>Grass Valley CA 95945
>(530) 401-8024
>www.berkeleysolar.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: William Miller [mailto:wrmiller at charter.net]
>Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 5:07 PM
>To: RE-wrenches at topica.com
>Subject: RE: homework [RE-wrenches]
>
>
>Mark:
>
>Same drawing.  Module tilt is 63.1 deg from horizontal.
>
>WM
>


- - - -
Hosted by Home Power magazine

To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at re-wrenches.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------



</x-flowed>