Drainback vs. Closed Loop Circulators [RE-wrenches]

Todd Cory, Mt. Shasta Energy Services toddcory at finestplanet.com
Fri May 19 13:22:45 PDT 2006


<x-flowed>

I hope Jeff Lane steps in on this one.

I have seen bad experiences with evacuated tube collectors. They are 
fragile and the performance gain is not worth it unless you are trying 
to make steam. Flat plate collectors are heavy and take 2 to 3 people to 
lift them on the roof, but they last forever.

Drainbacks are more efficient in terms of heat transfer, but the energy 
for pumping is MUCH higher than a closed glycol loop. It is probably a 
toss up as to which is better. What do others think about this?

Todd


- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read

List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------


</x-flowed>



More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list