Drainback vs. Closed Loop Circulators [RE-wrenches]
Todd Cory, Mt. Shasta Energy Services
toddcory at finestplanet.com
Fri May 19 13:22:45 PDT 2006
<x-flowed>
I hope Jeff Lane steps in on this one.
I have seen bad experiences with evacuated tube collectors. They are
fragile and the performance gain is not worth it unless you are trying
to make steam. Flat plate collectors are heavy and take 2 to 3 people to
lift them on the roof, but they last forever.
Drainbacks are more efficient in terms of heat transfer, but the energy
for pumping is MUCH higher than a closed glycol loop. It is probably a
toss up as to which is better. What do others think about this?
Todd
- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & how to change your email address: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Hosted by Home Power magazine
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list