battery cycle life [RE-wrenches]
Ray Walters
ray at solarray.com
Fri Dec 31 16:01:30 PST 2004
<x-flowed>
Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Buy Stocks and Index Funds for just $4 No Account or
Investment Minimums and No Inactivity Fees Automatically
invest weekly or monthly and build your future.
http://click.topica.com/caacVmlbz8Qcsbz9JC9a/Sharebuilder
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hi;
Did you take into account the variation of AH capacity relative to
discharge rate (Puekert's Exponent?) That changes the calculations too. I
did a spread sheet for a customer to compare different battery types for
total cost per KWH over their lifespan. I included maintenance &
replacement costs. The L16s were the worst. The golf cart batteries were
the best deal not considering maintenance, and the big cells (Rolls series
5000) were the best deal in the long run including maintenance costs, but
that was with a healthy discount . At retail prices, the golf cart
batteries are the best (If the customer maintains them)
From the chart below, The L16 has 600 cycles at 100% DOD, the T105 has 750
cycles at 100%DOD. I quit selling L16s all together about a year ago.
Cheers to a better New Year,
Ray
>Very interesting cycle life curve. If you convert the data to equivalent
>full-cycle values, ie, 10% x 4398 = AH of 439.8 full cycles. And from
>that, it's easy to see the most economical DOD design:
>
>E-Cycles DOD
>440 10%
>464 20%
>484 30%
>506 40%
>518 50%
>530 60%
>542 70%
>558 80%
>570 90%
>600 100%
>
>Based on this data, the economically optimized configuration would
>be designed around the deepest possible DOD. If the data is correct,
>there is clear *penalty* for shallow battery cycling, and a *benefit*
>to deep cycles. When you also consider the time-value of money,
>a smaller pack lets you keep the incremental cost for a larger pack
>in you pocket (or bank, collecting interest) until later when needed.
>The important negative factors are that 1) designing around deep DOD
>leaves less margin for discharge variation/capacity decline, 2) more
>frequent battery pack replacements do come with a cost.
>
>In any case, this does sort of corroborate peoples not-so-great
>results with L16 packs for solar applications (vis a vis cheaper
>golf cart batteries or "real" solar batteries).
>
>/wk
==========================================================
Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Get the latest weather,
sports, and lifestyle news you can't afford to miss, all
at a price you can afford to pay! Click now!
http://click.topica.com/caaa9eYbz8Qcsbz9JC9f/TopOffers
==========================================================
- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Archive of previous messages: http://lists.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/read
List rules & etiquette: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquette.php
Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/
Hosted by Home Power magazine
Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the RE-wrenches
mailing list