Bureaucracy - I think it should be California Bureaucracy right now [RE-wre

Jeffery Wolfe, Global Resource Options jeff at globalresourceoptions.com
Sun Jan 5 17:05:42 PST 2003


>From what little I know, public benefit charges are NOT considered TAXES.
What the precise legal difference is, I can't expound on. But in our
legislative work here (where we do have an SBC: Systems Benefits Charge, but
not for PV) it's always been clearly stated that the SBC is not a tax. Makes
it a little easier for the "no new taxes" guys and gals to vote for it.

Also, in the original post on this subject, I think it mentioned funds
provided as "production incentives". The paragraph seemed, to me, to be
addressing the large wind production tax credit, not small or large PV.

Does CA have a weatherization program? Does it require all labor to be paid
at "prevailing wage"?

Pray for an end to the snow this week! (What's the sun?)

Jeff Wolfe



-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Owen [mailto:graham at solarexpert.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:59 PM
To: RE-wrenches at topica.com
Subject: RE: Bureaucracy - I think it should be California Bureaucracy
right now [RE-wre



Matt,

Below I am pasting a section of text from the SB1078 Analysis.  There
might be a chink in the armor if it can be demonstrated that the PGC
(Public Goods Charge) is in fact not public?  How do we find out who
amended the text in SB1078, which changed, and classified PV
installations with PGC funds to be deemed Public works?


“Work done by renewable energy generators and developers who
receive PGC funds pursuant to this bill for construction or
repair of renewable energy resources would be regarded as
"public works."  By virtue of being regarded as public works,
the work done would be subject to the state's prevailing wage
laws.  A question arises as to whether or not the PGC funds are
genuinely public funds.  Unlike taxes, the PGC is collected by
private entities as a fee that is collected in proportion to the
amount of energy used by the customer.  It is, however, true
that there is some government involvement in the administration
of the funds once collected, which could lead to a conclusion
that the character of the funds is public.”


Graham

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/

List rules & etiquette: http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com

- - - -
To send a message: RE-wrenches at topica.com

Archive of previous messages: http://www.topica.com/lists/RE-wrenches/

List rules & etiquette: http://www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/etiquete.htm

Check out participant bios: www.mrsharkey.com/wrenches/index.html

Hosted by Home Power magazine

Moderator: michael.welch at homepower.com

==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: michael.welch at homepower.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Qcs.bz9JC9.bWljaGFl
Or send an email to: RE-wrenches-unsubscribe at topica.com

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^^===============================================================







More information about the RE-wrenches mailing list